THE RESET OBSERVATORY
When is the next reset?
Explore reset forecasts, public records, and reset-card opportunities across Codex, Claude, Gemini, GLM, Kimi, and Antigravity.
Codex reset forecast
Target: a new announcement of an exceptional automatic usage reset
Experimental probability of a new announcement within 24 hours of issue
Historical baseline 16.9%
- 24 hours
- 16.9%
- 48 hours
- 30.7%
- 7 days
- 71.5%
Event days in the forecast
17Historical observation span
90daysAvailable monitoring sources
4/ 4Forecast status
ExperimentalTHE RECORD
A source for every reset.
FOLLOW THE SIGNAL
Public sources, clearly identified.
Codex and Claude use third-party reset catalogs. Other platforms show reviewed public records and official rules. Periodic rule checks do not discover new announcements. Regular renewals, manual reset cards and policy changes are kept separate from automatic-reset forecasts.
Tibo public posts
CollectedThird-party aggregator · Links to X originals
Last success Sep 10, 2026, 10:31 AM UTC
Open source ↗Codex reset history
CollectedThird-party historical record
Last success Sep 10, 2026, 10:31 AM UTC
Open source ↗OpenAI Status
CollectedOfficial incident source
Last success Sep 10, 2026, 10:31 AM UTC
Open source ↗Codex client releases
CollectedOfficial GitHub · Not a model release
Last success Sep 10, 2026, 10:31 AM UTC
Open source ↗HOW WE ESTIMATE
An estimate,
not a promise.
Platforms can change their policies at any time. These estimates do not mean your account will receive a reset.
01Start with history, then consider new signals
Over the past 90 days, automatic reset announcements on the same UTC date count as one event day. We need at least 30 days of observation and 5 event days to show a probability. The third-party historical record may be incomplete.
The Gamma–Poisson model uses α = 1 + event days and β = 7 + observed days. The baseline probability of at least one announcement in the next h days is 1 − (β / (β + h))^α.
02How public signals affect the estimate
Reset previews, model releases, usage incidents, and community signals have manually chosen weights of 2.0, 0.35, 0.25, and 0.10. Each is scaled by source weight and decays with age. Only the past 72 hours count, and only the strongest signal in each group is used.
These weights are experimental assumptions, not trained or calibrated values. Banked resets and ordinary client updates do not increase the automatic-reset estimate. Without valid new signals, the adjusted estimate equals the baseline. The 7-day result is a longer-range extrapolation.
03How we evaluate forecasts
We save each forecast and its source cutoff times, then wait for the outcome. Missing collection periods do not count as “no reset.” We do not present another project’s results as our own.
Historical replay and prospective scoring are kept separate. We need timestamped forecasts and comparisons against the baseline using Brier score and Log Loss before claiming better accuracy.
04Open-source references and event definitions
tibo-reset-watch informed public-post monitoring; tibo-reset-lab provides an auditable forecasting experiment. This site is independently implemented.
Automatic resets, banked resets that must be redeemed, and regular account usage renewals are different events. Read OpenAI’s explanation ↗